翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Commodity Classification Standards Board ・ Commodity computing ・ Commodity Credit Corporation ・ Commodity currency ・ Commodity Distribution Program ・ Commodity Distribution Reform Act and WIC Amendments of 1987 ・ Commodity exchange ・ Commodity Exchange Act ・ Commodity Exchange Authority ・ Commodity Exchange Bratislava ・ Commodity fetishism ・ Commodity form theory ・ Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 ・ Commodity Futures Trading Commission ・ Commodity Futures Trading Commission Act of 1974 ・ Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor ・ Commodity index fund ・ Commodity loan rate ・ Commodity management ・ Commodity market ・ Commodity money ・ Commodity pathway diversion ・ Commodity plastics ・ Commodity pool ・ Commodity pool operator ・ Commodity price index ・ Commodity price shocks ・ Commodity programs ・ Commodity risk ・ Commodity swap Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor ： ウィキペディア英語版 Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor ''Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor'', 478 U.S. 833 (1986), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held an administrative agency may, in some cases, exert jurisdiction over state-law counterclaims. ==Background== The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), ''et seq.'', prohibits fraudulent conduct in the trading of futures contracts. In 1974, Congress amended the Act to create a more comprehensive regulatory framework for the trading of futures contracts. To that end, Congress created an administrative agency called the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). One of the duties assigned to the CFTC was the administration of a quasi-judicial reparations procedure by which customers of commodities brokers could seek legal redress for brokers’ alleged violations of the Act or other CFTC regulations. One of the CFTC’s regulations also provided the agency to adjudicate counterclaims “arising out of the same transaction or occurrence or series of transactions or occurrences set forth in the complaint”. The section of the statute and the CFTC regulation at issue in this case, both of which were intended to provide an inexpensive and expeditious method for the settlement of futures contract-related claims, were challenged by the customers of a broker as being violative of Article III of the United States Constitution. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.